Homeblog and Yunus Diary - worldwide and minevulnerability - does microcreditsummit have a futureTop 10 Microcredits for YouthMicrocredits Most Critical Activity Connections in 2010sWest Europe's Model Microcredits for Job Creation & Renewal of Economic UnionPose questions to gurus of microcredit doesn't work2012 yearbook of Social Business- Europe and Africamaker faire -one of the great Ygeneration interventions in value chainssocial business- the economics framework of microcredit?Original Grameen Bank caseGlobal Grameen - sustainable world favourite brand partnersGrameenKenya will be best ever becauseResults, Best NewsDefining different ways 7 billion people can use micocreditwhat are 10 most different local bank s americans need for freedom of choice & community risingDecember 08 specification of Grameen Microcredit by Dr YunusCase Studies of being trusted to value multiply MicroEveryServicewhat is microcredit?History of Trillion Dollar AuditingWomen Report MFIAccion's Badwill Mexican Tripwhat's realMc's Three-in-OneJoin 24 people on 64 year round trips to Dhakamicrocredit africaCollaboration InvestigationsBoP; Banker of Poor - Deep ReviewsBig bang of Citizen meetings : how Bangladesh*CA*London questioned the wwwBooks & networks of practicemicrocredit netizen hall of fameProfessions for Purposeful BusinessesResources from Yunus 1000 bookclub begun 3 Jan 08, DhakaMore maps for ending digital dividesTrust Map 2/24 EducationCommunitymicrocredit & world entrepreneur991 project
Inauguration Challenge #1 of 009
?yes we can start an urgent exploration of the future of banks small/local enough to love people's working lifetimes and communities sustainable development
- which yes we can beliefs (and peoples stories http://my.barackobama.com/yourstories
) should we take with us from the starting line as we race to to unite the nation through hi-trust banking:
REALITY OF HI-TRUST VERSUS IMAGE OF INCONVENIENT TRUTH
...microentrepreneurs then openly replicate the biggest uniting purpose as boldly as you dare go foth and network godwill around - this is the magic of micro up instead of being big brothered by large unseen powers and false information through media and PR lobbies tying up government in never agreeing anything that matters most for the next generation's sustainability. Can you help us search out 9 different banking services that communities could be testing;
25 feb Japan's Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Ms Seiko Hashimoto and former Minister of Education Kisaburo Tokai met with
Nobel Laureate Professor Muhammad Yunus on Monday at his office. Later on the day, a six-member team of visiting German parliamentarians
MicroBanking takes over the developed world
Hungary- FEB09 http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0212/breaking67.htm group of leading Hungarian bankers and the Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour have begun a study to determine whether the Grameen example could work in Hungary as well. If the results are positive, the bank could start later this year.Experts believe hundreds of thousands of people subsist in endemic poverty in Hungary with little hope of a way out.Grameen-type projects have sprung up around the developing world, but nearly none exist in industrialised nations.
Moscow- 10 peoples from Russia reached dhaka yesterday on 4 days visit headed by the Economic Deputy Minister of Russian Federation including the mayor of Moscow. Last year Yunus was visiting moscow invited by national association of microfinance and met the vice prime minister who expressed to establish the grameen type micro credit in Russia. So the team is visiting Grameen to learn the grameen type banking. the team also includes high official of economic development ministry and national microfinance assocition, association of regional banks, national association of microfinance market stock holders.
Jan09 California http://yunusforum.net/?m=200902 California State University announces that they are going to establish the same model of Grameen Bank in California and other states of USA. A team headed by University Vice President Julia Wilson has recently visited Bangladesh where they made the announcement.
Jan09 Paris - the city of Paris, after a yearlong debate and discussion, has adopted a version of the "microcredit" method, invented by Dr Muhammad Yunus originally to fight poverty in a developing country. From this month the city of Paris (one of the richest in the world) is covering all its quarters to provide microcredits to the needy through one of the oldest banks of the city, Credit Municipal.
op-ed from ecoprofessors worth debating with -from the commons blog http://www.rethinkingdevelopment.blogspot.com/
18 September 2008
By LaDawn Haglund
Look just about anywhere in the U.S. economy today, and you will find bad news. Emergency after emergency strikes the financial system, resulting in multi-billion dollar taxpayer bailouts of Bear Stearns, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae, and now the collapse of Lehman Brothers. The housing market is in free-fall, with foreclosures at record highs. Unemployment is at its highest level since 2003, while underemployment continues to plague the working poor. The “misery index”, that is, the sum of the unemployment rate and the inflation rate, is rising faster than it has in nearly 30 years. Meanwhile, increasingly intense hurricanes fueled by global warming wreck costal cities as we fumble around, hopelessly inadequate to the task of reducing our dependence on fossil fuels, the main culprit behind the acceleration of greenhouse gases.
It is at moments like these that I can’t help but remember Karl Polanyi. In his 1944 book, The Great Transformation, Polanyi referred to land, labor, and money as “fictitious commodities.” Applying excessive market rationality to these realms, he argued, distorts the substantive relationship between the economy and society in ways that create insecurity and threaten the social fabric. What we are experiencing is the predictable result of a societal restructuring that made market exchange the key organizing principle in places it doesn’t belong. Eventually something has got to give: business-as-usual is likely to lead to a breakdown in our financial, ecological, and/or human systems.
Back here in Arizona, I am living a mild version of this narrative. A steadily increasing cost of living and a stubbornly fixed salary (due to spending cutbacks in education) has made it difficult for me to make my mortgage payments. Expensive gasoline adds to the woes, and not even my Prius can save me (though I am grateful to the Japanese for developing such a nice hybrid vehicle). Recently, when I was really feeling a pinch, I tried to refinance my house. But alas, in this economy—with a burst housing bubble, imploding mortgages, and foreclosures aplenty—my sorry case was met with a kindly “thanks, but no thanks.”
So I find myself struggling to make ends meet like millions of other Americans. But what does this admittedly sad but ultimately manageable problem have to do with development economics? After all, at least I have a job, a car, and a house. I am certainly not poor. I have access to credit. And if worse came to worst, I would have numerous options: Look for a better job. Sell the house. Take the bus. These basic possibilities are not available to millions of the world’s poor.
But bear with me, dear reader. I will explain. You see, over the last several decades, the United States has been experiencing a rich-country version of the market fundamentalism that was thrust upon the developing world by Washington in the 1980s and 1990s. This fundamentalism led to deregulation of the financial system, the removal of safeguards against speculation and greed, the dismantling of social safety nets, the easing of environmental regulations, and increasingly, the privatization of risk . The exception, of course, is the fiscal austerity policies that forced developing countries to limit deficit spending—the Bush Administration has not held itself to those same pesky standards, especially when it comes to spending on warfare.
Given the terrible consequences for humans and the earth, it is particularly perplexing that market fundamentalism has gone so far for so long. As I argue in my manuscript, Limiting Resources: Market-Led Development and the Transformation of Public Goods, it is not just an ideological project spearheaded by political elites. It is at the core of economic thinking. In contrast to popular understandings of “public goods”—where education, health care, water, and infrastructure are ensured by government, with an implicit social agreement to promote well-being and justice for the people—economists are trained to evaluate public goods devoid of social content. “The public” (you and I) is reduced to prisoners’ dilemmas and collective action problems, while state intervention is incorporated mainly as a last resort to remedy market “failure.”
One result of this thin understanding of the full social significance of public goods has been a turn to markets wherever possible, via unbundling, contracting, granting concessions, and privatization. At the same time, taxes have been reduced to levels that cannot sustain robust social programs. The resulting excessive reliance on markets has virtually depleted the pool of resources considered “public” and precluded important non-market alternatives, in developed and developing countries alike. The effects of “free” markets in money, land, and human beings (Polanyi’s “fictitious commodities”) in the United States illustrate the danger:
Money. The abstraction “money” has only a tenuous connection with the real economy, as any trader will tell you. Regulation is imperative for checking usury and speculative finance, i.e., not allowing money to be just another commodity. The Asian and subsequent financial crises are a stinging reminder that money cannot fill an empty stomach. The current meltdown on Wall Street was preceded by decades of deregulation and the growth of a “shadow banking system” that now reaches far beyond our fair shores. The looming crisis is likely to be equally far-reaching. At this late stage, we can only hope that the severe dislocations resulting from efforts to institute a “self-regulating market system” in the 19th century—World Wars and a Great Depression—do not make a return in the 21st.
Land. Despite unequivocal evidence that human-induced global warming is threatening not only stronger storms but also “heat waves, new wind patterns, worsening drought in some regions, heavier precipitation in others, melting glaciers and Arctic ice, and rising global average sea levels,” the Bush Administration has been unwilling to intervene in order to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, cooperate with other countries on climate change, or invest adequately in alternatives. Though there were some meager incentive programs, these were all designed to not “rock the boat” of traditional market activity and adhered to the twisted logic that growth would ultimately protect the earth and lead to sustainability. Unfortunately, the magnitude of the climate crisis calls for visionary leadership at the highest levels—something that is clearly not going to come from this administration.
Human life. Our abysmal, market-based health care system in the United State speaks volumes regarding how well markets protect human life. The United States ranks lower than every OECD country in infant mortality except Turkey and Mexico, and lower in life expectancy than all except Eastern Europe and Mexico. Even countries with much more modest resources, like Cuba and Costa Rica, do better because of public investment, according to a recent World Health Organization report. A litany of horror stories supports the conclusion that a for-profit medical system is inhumane and relatively ineffective in delivering “goods” essential to human life. In terms of labor, we see rising productivity levels being matched with stagnating wages, making it harder and harder for working people to make ends meet.
According to Polanyi, society survives the disruption caused by attempts to institute a self-regulating market system through intervention and re-introducing non-economic norms and values to economic activity. This process often entails harnessing the state to ameliorate negative externalities and achieve positive ones. For example, regulation can limit the pursuit of money for money’s sake, as speculators look to “flip that house” (and reap huge profits) or Wall Street brokers demand greater and greater returns. Meanwhile, state-led development and investment in alternative technologies are going to be essential for finding ways to stop abusing the earth—sucking oil from its bowels through a pipeline while suffocating it with stinging pollutants through a tailpipe. Alternative energy is the future, and we need state action to get us there. Finally, state investment in strong social safety nets can help us care for one another where markets do not, and cannot. Rather than leaving us to fend for ourselves in some warped Social Darwinist experiment, we can create institutionalized safeguards to protect our frail bodies and fragile lives from the worst suffering and threats to our well-being.
With a U.S. presidential election less than two months away, it is becoming increasingly clear what is at stake. “More of the same” market fundamentalism of John McCain’s party could be very bad for the sound and just management of money, land, and labor. But are Americans ready for the real changes needed to turn this ship around? After all, we are the poster children of over-consumption, and we tend to vote for political leaders with a willful disregard of the catastrophic consequences of our addictions: cheap oil, cheap food, and cheap goods. Let’s hope that the magnitude of the current crisis will awaken us to the issues that really matter.
LaDawn Haglund received her Ph.D. in Sociology from New York University in 2005. She is Assistant Professor in the School for Justice and Social Inquiry in the Arizona State University, USA.
Enter content here
Enter content here
Enter supporting content here